The
Architect shows that the façade doesn’t matter: whether a luxury home or a
decrepit mass housing project, the families inside can all feel misery. This movie was as off putting as it was
engaging. There were many lines of plot
that ran along side each other, dipping into each other’s paths without ever
truly weaving together. I would say that
in order to enjoy this movie you must focus on performance over plot or
resolution. Anthony LaPaglia’s Leo
Waters is a man whose job it is to control, design, and create but whose
personal life cannot seem to fall into place with such efficiency and ease. His wife is bored and distant, afraid that
their marriage and life has left her “eroded”. His daughter is miserable, upset
at her family’s dysfunction and uncomfortable and confused about her changing
body and her father’s awareness of it.
His son, played by Sebastian Stan, is rebellious and in the midst of a
sexual awakening that is desperate, difficult, and ultimately
heartbreaking. Alongside this story is
that of Tony Neely, portrayed movingly by Viola Davis. She feels the oppression and dangers of the
world she lives in. Gang members at
every corner, smart kids dropping out of school for a life on the street. Her eldest daughter revels in trash
television so she can know that she at least has not fallen as far as some
have; her youngest daughter barely even lives with her having earned a
scholarship to a better school in a better part of town. Her son’s death was the final push to begin her
campaign to tear down the inefficient and inhumane housing project that was
more conducive to gangs than to families.
These two worlds cross paths when Tony seeks the support of the
architect of the housing facilities in her quest to tear them down and build
them anew. Only Leo’s pride will not let
him concede the buildings’ failures.
Unfortunately,
this film never quite reaches its peak.
There are brilliant moments: Sebastian Stan’s desperate surrender to his
homosexual feelings, Viola Davis’ confrontation with her youngest daughter over
her denial of the reason her son died, and Stan’s quiet intensity as he gazes
over his one time lover’s body. While
poignant and thought provoking, these moments of intense emotion and
exploration of one’s identity and one’s own hidden motivations are not
connected in a way that flows or advances their meaning. This is a movie of snapshots. They are merely the blueprints of a great
movie: terrific acting and the exploration of very real questions. But with nothing filling in those blueprints,
no structure or consistency, the film remains just that: great in concept,
adequate in execution.
No comments:
Post a Comment